Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

PostHeaderIcon Why Some Labels Will Sidestep Fashion Week

A show during New York Fashion Week is perceived as a pinnacle of success for an American designer. Yet, as WSJ On Style columnist Christina Binkley reports on Lunch Break, when Fashion Week opens Feb. 7, a number of labels will have dropped off the calendar. Photo: Getty Images.

New York Fashion Week has long been perceived as a pinnacle of success for an American designer. Yet when fashion week opens Feb. 7, a number of labels that showed there in the past will be sitting it out.

Joy Cioci will instead present her collection in mid-March after editors and buyers return from Paris Fashion Week, the last event in the monthlong round of collections. The New York calendar “was so crowded, and it’s so hectic for buyers and the editors, she says of the four seasons she showed at the fashion-week tents. “I just felt that I wasn’t getting the investment return.”

Yoana Baraschi, whose 10-year-old label showed at fashion week for many seasons, will also move to mid-March. Her presentation, she says, will be more intimate, and she will be able to hire high-caliber talent that is usually booked during fashion week.

Getty Images

Mackage started showing in Toronto, skipping New York Fashion Week, where its spring 2012 collection, above, was unveiled.

“Everybody wants the same models and the same stylists. It’s just spinning out of control,” Ms. Baraschi says of the official week. “No one can see as many shows as there are now.”

New York’s calendar has become noticeably more crowded as labels squeeze in with entrepreneurial zeal. While fashion shows used to be limited to high-style labels, midprice contemporary labels and menswear brands are now muscling into New York. One reason: No official body controls the calendar, unlike in Milan and Paris, where just a few dozen labels are invited to show in each fashion week. So far, 283 labels have registered to present collections at New York Fashion Week, up from 204 in Feb. 2007, according to the Fashion Calendar, a company that tracks fashion events.

[image]

Giorgio Niro

Yoana Baraschi

While the official calendar runs Thursday to Thursday from Feb. 7-14, designers actually will start showing as early as Monday, Feb. 4, turning the “week” into 11 days.

There are hourly collisions on the busiest days. At 4 p.m. Monday, four labels are showing in various locations around New York. At 8 p.m. Sunday, editors must choose between seeing Tommy Hilfiger and Ralph Rucci. And after seeing 10 or more collections a day, most viewers have to look at photos to bring the blur of clothes back into focus.

“I need memory retention. I need a chance to sit and talk to these people,” says designer Daniel Vosovic, who is moving his three-year-old label to a March presentation as well.

WireImage

Joy Cioci

Often, it is cheaper to circumvent New York Fashion Week. Mackage designers Elisa Dahan and Eran Elfassy found it less expensive to fly editors to their show at Toronto Fashion Week. They launched Montreal-based Mackage in New York in 1999—but started showing in Toronto last year. “I feel like we were little kids trying to accomplish a dream,” Ms. Dahan says of those early shows. But in Toronto, she says, they can hire top models who are contractually forbidden to do their shows in New York because of agreements with more powerful brands.

The cost of a show during New York Fashion Week is generally six figures and can rise to more than $1 million for big brands. If you hire top models, the minimum cost of a show is $350,000, says Ms. Baraschi, who estimates she will save 60% of the cost by moving to March.

Many designers are creating carefully produced videos of their collections. Rather than limiting their audience to the people at the show, they can send the video to stores and editors, use it for advertising and put it on YouTube and style.com. “It has longevity,” Ms. Cioci says.

Designers who forsake New York’s fashion week still plan to keep their showrooms open to take orders from store buyers during the week, just as they have in the past.

WireImage

Daniel Vosovic

The split highlights the increasing separation between store buyers and fashion editors. Shows, with their pomp and drama, are increasingly focused on marketing to magazine editors. As designers try to accommodate the growing number of celebrities and bloggers, stores have been crowded out. While top fashion executives at big department stores such as Saks and Neiman Marcus still get invitations, they aren’t always in the front rows. And smaller store buyers sometimes struggle to obtain invitations at all.

The chaos is a natural part of a fast-changing industry, says Tom Florio, former publisher of Vogue, who recently took over as CEO of Advanstar Fashion group, which runs eight fashion trade shows. Mr. Florio’s new shows, which seek to get higher fashion into the trade-show environment, aim to lure New York Fashion Week regulars. One show called “The Tents” will launch later this month in Las Vegas, inviting trendy menswear labels such as Billy Reid and Michael Bastian to participate. “There are so many ways to communicate fashion today,” says Mr. Florio. “You don’t necessarily have to tell that story on the runway anymore.

None of this diminishes many designers’ aspirations to reach New York fashion week. To launch her new ready-to-wear Rivini line during fashion week, bridal designer Rita Vinieris started looking for open times in October. “The calendar is insanely crowded,” she says. She settled on Feb. 6, a day before official fashion week. She hopes to reach editors who miss her presentation with a video and private appointments.

Nary Manivong, whose label will be showed to editors by appointment in March, says he is sanguine about skipping New York Fashion Week. “For me, fashion week will always be there. I can always come back.”

Write to Christina Binkley at christina.binkley@wsj.com

Corrections & Amplifications

The name of the fashion label that designer Nary Manivong will show in March is Nary Manivong. An earlier version of this article incorrectly called the label NAHM.

A version of this article appeared January 23, 2013, on page D3 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Why Some Labels Will Sidestep Fashion Week.

© 2011 Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com)

PostHeaderIcon ‘Augustine’ And Her Diagnosis Get Another Look

Story By: by Mark Jenkins

Augustine (the French singer-actress billed as Soko) was a 19th-century Paris housemaid diagnosed with the then-fashionable condition known as “hysteria” — a catchall used to label many ailments women suffered in that age.

Augustine

Not rated; nudity, sexual situations, violence

With: Soko, Vincent Lindon, Chiara Mastroianni

In French with English subtitles

Onstage, in front of an audience, the young woman seemingly goes into a trance, overcome by a power that shakes and contorts her. The commotion appears profoundly sexual; she grabs at her crotch as she writhes. When the woman reaches some kind of release, the spell is broken, and she becomes calm. She leaves the stage to enthusiastic applause.

This isn’t one of those New Vaudeville acts; it’s what passed for medicine in 1870s France. The crowd watching the seizure in Alice Winocour’s assured debut feature, Augustine, is a group of doctors, and what they’re acclaiming is the work of a prominent neurologist, Jean-Martin Charcot. The squirming creature is just a prop.

Charcot (Vincent Lindon) was a real-life figure, and by no means a quack. He made some notable medical discoveries, and counted Sigmund Freud among his students. But he lived in a time when all sorts of women’s ailments, whether physical or psychological, were attributed to “ovarian hysteria.

Augustine is more historical drama than feminist parable, but it does attempt to reclaim the identity of one of the many women Charcot treated. Augustine, played with quiet fierceness by the musician-actress Soko, is revealed here as somewhat more than the “magnificent patient” her doctor describes.

When the story begins, Augustine is a 19-year-old kitchen maid. While serving at a dinner party, she has an attack that leaves her partly paralyzed. She’s sent to an asylum full of women whose myriad symptoms are all considered manifestations of one aspect of their being: their womanhood.

Charcot is reputable, if eccentric. He lives with a pet gibbon and the heiress wife (Chiara Mastroianni) who helps support his career. Fascinated with Augustine’s case, he gives the young woman special privileges, such as a private room; when she goes into a funk, he even feeds her soup, spoonful by spoonful.

Yet despite his fascination with Augustine — a fascination that’s partly erotic — Charcot always sees himself as superior. It’s not until the film’s final act that the two become collaborators of a sort, and the move leading to that change is taken by Augustine, not the doctor.

While not neglecting historical details, the director takes a modernist approach to storytelling, declining to fill in Augustine’s backstory. (Reportedly, her childhood was traumatic, but it’s not mentioned here.) The movie is intentionally short on expository dialogue and larger context.

Exactly what ailed Augustine, in any case, cannot be determined. Her seizures suggest epilepsy, but the paralysis does not. Winocour doesn’t attempt to diagnose her after the fact, or imagine what her treatment might be today. She breaks period in only one significant way — by punctuating the film with brief straight-to-camera testimonies by present-day women in psychiatric treatment. Their symptoms are real and contemporary, but the speakers are dressed in belle epoque clothing. (One other anachronism: Jocelyn Pook’s Philip Glass-influenced score.)

Visually, the film conjures the past with shadowy interiors and harsh light. Winocour, who also scripted, often makes her points without words. Mastroianni is given little to say, but she does have an eloquent scene in which a servant removes Mme. Charcot’s corset and the camera lingers on her pinched flesh.

“There’s not much love in your books,” remarks Augustine as she peruses Charcot’s medical texts. Ultimately, Winocour does stage an instance of what could be called love. It’s unconvincing narratively, alas, and an odd disruption of the tone in a film that is otherwise bracingly clinical.

PostHeaderIcon Great Gatsby film opens Cannes

Leonardo DiCaprio and director Baz Luhrmann have appeared on the red carpet in Cannes as their new film The Great Gatsby opens the annual film festival.

"I just looked at it as an incredible character to take on, something that was subtle in its approach but had so much depth and meaning in every single line," he said.

Of the uneven reviews coming from US critics, he added: "All you can do is try your best.

"You go to make these films, you're off on location for months and months at a time, and all you can do is try your best. I know we did that for this film.

"Ultimately whether people embrace it or tear it apart is beyond anyone's control. All you can do is dedicate yourself to making a great piece of art and that's what we ultimately did."

Luhrmann told the BBC: "When Fitzgerald died, his book was horribly criticised. He had very mixed reviews. Some extremely cruel. Some of the grand critics called him a clown.

"When he died, he was buying copies of his own book just so some sales would register. Fitzgerald had to suffer much crueller and more ill-informed criticisms than I have. He tried to write the great American novel. I wish he knew that he did."

The Australian director added: "The other night we had a premiere and completely out of the blue a woman came out of the audience. She was quite old and frail. She held me by the hand and said, 'I've come to see what you did with my grandfather's book.' And of course I went cold, because I didn't know it was Fitzgerald's granddaughter.

"She said, 'All his life he's been maligned because you can't transfer first person narrative into film and in my opinion you have done it, and he would be very proud'."

No British films have been selected in the official competition though several debut filmmakers are being featured in other festival strands, such as the Cinefondation, which selects pieces made by film students from across the world.

UK director Paul Wright also makes his festival debut with For Those in Peril, a drama set in a remote Scottish village. It will be screened as part of Critics' Week.

This year's jury, which decides the Palme d'Or – the festival's top prize – is being headed by US director Steven Spielberg and includes Nicole Kidman and Oscar-winner Christoph Waltz.

Other films in competition include Steven Soderbergh's Liberace biopic, Behind the Candelabra; Nicolas Winding Refn's Only God Forgives, starring Ryan Gosling; Sideways director Alexander Payne's latest film Nebraska; and Jim Jarmusch's vampire film Only Lovers Left Alive, starring British actress Tilda Swinton.

The 2012 winner, Amour, directed by Michael Haneke, went on to win the Oscar for best foreign language film.

Last year's event saw more than 4,600 films exhibited over 10 days, with a huge rise in films from Asia.

China is now the second biggest film market in the world, following the US and recently co-produced the year's biggest hit film Iron Man 3.

Michael Douglas, Matt Damon, Ryan Gosling and Alain Delon are among the stars expected in the French resort for the festival which ends on 26 May.

© 2011 BBC News (www.bbc.co.uk)

PostHeaderIcon New Livelihood Selling Frankfurters

(See Corrections & Amplifications item below.)

BANDERA, Texas — In hard times, some small-town Americans are turning to a new livelihood with relish.

Among them are Andrea and Ben Guajardo. They began selling hot dogs from a pushcart on Main Street in November.

Ms. Guajardo is a grant administrator for a health-care system. Her husband, Ben, is a pipeline operator. Theirs is the first hot-dog stand in Bandera, pop. 957, that anybody here can remember.

“It’s a backup plan,” says Ms. Guajardo, a mother of four. “No one knows what’s going to happen with the economy, and I don’t want to have to scrounge for a minimum-wage job.”

Sarah E. Needleman/The Wall Street Journal

Andrea and Ben Guajardo both work full-time, but began selling wieners with help from their four kids in November.

Facing pay cuts and weakened job security, more Americans are turning to this century-old, big-city trade in outposts like Bandera, where cowboys on horseback share the road with motorcyclists. Many of these vendors are working professionals with day jobs, ranging from real-estate agents to train operators.

Sales of carts, which start at about $2,000 new, have heated up in the past year. “Every model is…taking off,” says Joel Goetz, owner of American Dream Hot Dog Carts Inc. in St. Petersburg, Fla. Since January, he has sold about 25 carts a week, 15 more than usual.

“Business is really off the charts,” says Dan Jackson, a division manager at Nation’s Leasing Services in Newbury Park, Calif. Leases for hot-dog carts account for about three-quarters of sales, and revenue is triple what it was this time a year ago, he says.

Hot dog vendors are a familiar sight in big cities around the country. For one Texas family, their weekend business is bringing in extra cash amid a slumping economy. Sarah Needleman reports from Bandera, Texas.

Today’s cart buyers are generally older and have more white-collar work experience than was traditionally the case, says Will Hodgskiss, president and “top dog” at Willy Dog Ltd., a New York cart manufacturer. “People are either buying these carts in anticipation of a layoff or to supplement their incomes,” he says. Willy Dog’s sales are up 30% from March 2007.

Street Food of Choice

Hot dogs are the street food of choice for vendors because frankfurters are sold precooked and therefore tend to undergo less scrutiny from state and city health departments. They’re also popular. Between Memorial Day and Labor Day, Americans typically consume seven billion hot dogs, according to the American Meat Institute’s National Hot Dog & Sausage Council.

“It’s a very recession-proof business,” says Kurt Horlacher, a former sheet-metal worker who co-owns four hot-dog stands in Sarasota, Fla., with his wife, Renee, a former registered nurse.

The two say their sales have increased 20% annually since they started two years ago, and they plan to open three more stands later this year. Their eight employees, who are paid $8 an hour, include laid-off professionals and part-time workers looking to augment their earnings. “I get three to five people applying for jobs each week,” says Mr. Horlacher.

A 25% increase in year-over-year cart sales has prompted one manufacturer, All American Hot Dog Carts Inc., to offer classes in how to succeed in wiener work. Later this month, Hot Dog University will cover everything from the right way to squirt mustard (in a swirling motion with a quick flick of the wrist) to how to heat up buns (steam them over the dogs for two minutes before serving).

[hot dog]

Then there’s the art of the sell. “You got to schmooze people,” says Louie Di Raimondo, the Miami company’s founder and self-appointed hot-dog king.

A skilled cart dealer in a pedestrian-heavy area can net up to $400 a day, say many vendors and cart-company officials. Newer dealers and those in less-ideal locations make one-third to half that amount. Weekend and event-only vendors, like the Guajardos, say that when the weather is good, they too can turn a hefty profit.

The Guajardos manage their two-wheeled stainless-steel hot-dog cart just on weekends, from about 11 a.m. to 2 p.m., in this Texas Hill Country downtown dotted with hitching posts, heavy-duty pickup trucks and cowboys leading cattle. They set up again on Saturday nights outside local honky-tonks like the Longhorn Saloon. They average $1,150 in take-home earnings each weekend selling roughly 400 dogs, plus drinks, chips and pickles. The couple’s four children often help out during the day.

“I tell them, ‘Your mom’s going to pay for your college education with hot dogs,” says Ms. Guajardo, while directing her oldest son, 13-year-old Ben, to put some more cans of soda and bottled water on ice. The business is named after another son, 6-year-old “Big Lou.”

Before they started, “you could find a flying frog easier than a hot-dog stand,” said 75-year-old William Ellis recently as he waited for a Chicago-style frankfurter, including neon green relish and sport peppers atop a poppy-seed bun.

From the Independent Street Blog

For others, hot-dogging is a stopgap. Real-estate investor Marty Katzenberger turned to it after the housing market tanked and he couldn’t sell any of his properties. “I found that I’m a little clumsy with my hot dogs,” says the 72-year-old, who withdrew $4,200 from his retirement savings to get started at a Sarasota, Fla., beach resort. Mr. Katzenberger, who generates an average of $150 in profits a day and works five days a week, says he’s considering moving to a new location to boost his earnings further.

The work — which requires hours of standing — can be quite an adjustment for people accustomed to sitting behind desks at 9-to-5 jobs. There’s also a lot of preparation and cleaning involved.

Then there’s the growing competition. Many small cities and towns have never had to worry much about enforcing laws that limit the number of pushcarts — until now.

Connie Means, a former college math professor who owns four wiener stands in Gadsden, Ala., recently encountered her first competition since starting her business in 2003. It came from a husband and wife who had previously sought her advice on becoming hot-dog vendors. “I tried to help them,” says Ms. Means, who makes about $42,000 annually working six days a week. “I didn’t realize they were going to set up two or three blocks from me.”

Growing Competition

Gadsden officials say there are more competitors on the way. The municipality of about 37,000 is now considering changes to a vending ordinance that would require new carts to be farther apart from one another. “They all want to be in a four-block radius,” says Shane Ellison, a city planner.

After Jerry and Sandra Mottola ordered a $3,000 hot-dog cart online recently, they discovered that there were only two available locations zoned for the purpose in their hometown of Haverhill, Mass. A local hardware store rejected the couple’s request to set up on its property. Ultimately, they scored an open spot near a courthouse, library and shopping plaza.

Mr. Mottola hopes his new business, Family Hot Dog, will supplement his sagging income as a home contractor. “I’m creating my own stimulus plan,” he says. “I’m not waiting for the president.”

Write to Sarah E. Needleman at sarah.needleman@wsj.com

Corrections & Amplifications

Lou Guajardo was incorrectly identified as Ben Guajardo in a photo caption accompanying a this article on hot-dog vendors.

© 2011 Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com)

PostHeaderIcon Needed: Men Who Will be True Heroes for Heroic Women

LONG ISLAND, NY (Catholic Online) – There has been an unusual tide of media attention recently about female sexuality due to the upcoming election in the United States. We have all heard the unfortunate battle cries of “war on women” and “war on mothers.” Our nation just fought multiple life exhausting wars in the Middle East and we choose such ridiculous slogans for election propaganda! Despite this election season’s unholy politicization of the human person, the most troubling issue is that only female sexuality is under fire while male sexuality has been shelved like yesterday’s news.


Bonnie Tyler once sang a song called “Holding Out for a Hero.” It begins with, “Where have all the good men gone?” and ends with “I need a hero. I’m holding out for a hero ’til the end of the night.” The saddest thing about this song is I can see it being played unnoticed in the hearts of many women young and old these days. Well guys, who wants to be a true hero for these women? What exactly does a hero have to do? Wear a cool yellow and red suit with an artificial intelligence called Jarvis? Sling a red, white, and blue shield with a star on it? Get really angry and turn into a super strong hulking green monster? Thankfully life is not a Marvel action film because as nice as those things may sound we have a better model in Christ.


“Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her.” (Ephesians 5:25) We all know well what Christ did for and will continue to do for the Church. Christ is not responsible for our sins but in a gift of sincere love He takes responsibility to fulfill humanity’s need for a relationship with God. The moral of the story is Christ saw a great need in us and fulfilled it.


Consequently, God calls all men to understand the needs of women and fulfill them for a family to flourish. For too long the “experts” and pundits have been selling the unfortunate line that men can’t understand women. These insidious characters have struck at the heart of a man’s unique role in the family to understand and love his wife as Christ loved the Church. The saddest part is many men have been demoralized by these attacks and are backing away from the most important challenge a man will face in his life.


This man, however, has decided that no one is going to tell him what he can and cannot understand except for his God. This man has discovered that he is not perfect but is not going to let imperfection stop him from transcending those imperfections to do his duty. If I must stand alone with Christ so be it! The only reward is an unseen perfect sense of honor that God bestows on each man to fortify him in his quest to love his wife as Christ loves the Church. Do not expect parades, accolades, medals, or ribbons. Instead expect sacrifice, humility, and scorn just like Christ endured.


We also need honorable young men to reaffirm in young women that they have a true “hero” in them. When the world of pundits tells a young woman that her sex appeal is her strength, a true “hero” will counter that her true strength is in her character and beautiful emotion. When a young woman’s friends are pressuring her to do something for cheap status, a true “hero” will resolutely stand by her to affirm and defend her virtue.


A true “hero” will also wipe away the tears and lift up a young woman’s spirit when society takes advantage of her. These young men could be anyone but they should be YOU! There is nothing sweeter in the entire world than a woman’s genuine affection for a man. It is our turn to return the favor and make sure the next song that is sung is “Held By a Hero!”


—–


Joseph Rogers is a 26 year old Catholic man from Long Island, NY studying Material Science. Philosophy, history, and theology to feed his curiosity about understanding the human person. Christ is his greatest inspiration and strength in learning how to better serve those around him. His Catholic faith is important to him and has opened many doors in his life.

Published by: Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

PostHeaderIcon Boxer Floyd Mayweather tops highest-paid U.S. athletes’ list


NEW YORK |
Wed May 15, 2013 1:33pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Undefeated boxer Floyd Mayweather Jr. is the highest-paid professional athlete in the United States with expected earnings of at least $90 million this year from just two bouts, according to Sports Illustrated magazine.

The 36-year-old welterweight – considered the best defensive boxer of his generation – topped the magazine’s Fortunate 50 list, issued on Wednesday. Mayweather also took the top spot last year, earning an estimated $85 million, again from just two fights, the magazine reported.

Miami Heat basketball star LeBron James, 28, a four-time National Basketball Association Most Valuable Player, came in this year in the number two slot, earning a total of $56.5 million.

The list is calculated by combining estimated salary, winnings and endorsements. Mayweather’s total earnings are even more impressive considering he received no endorsement money either this year or last.

James’ $56.5 million income combines a $17.5 million salary with an additional $39 million in endorsements.

Golfer Tiger Woods, the highest paid U.S. athlete from 2004, when the list was first published, through 2011, dropped to the No. 5 slot on this year’s list, earning $40.8 million.

Chicago Cubs outfielder Alfonso Soriano came in as the 50th highest-paid U.S. athlete with an estimated $18.2 million.

Candidates for the list must be U.S. citizens and compete in a U.S.-based league.

Internationally, soccer great David Beckham is estimated to earn more than $48 million, landing him the top spot on the magazine’s annual list of highest-paid athletes worldwide, The International 20.

(Reporting by Chris Francescani; Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Tim Dobbyn)

© 2011 REUTERS (www.reuters.com)

PostHeaderIcon Chaffetz: Obama has explaining to do on Benghazi

Editor’s note: U.S. Rep. Jason Chaffetz represents Utah’s 3rd Congressional District.

The three testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, recounting the horrific events that took the lives of four heroic Americans that day at the U.S. Consulate. Much of what we have known about Benghazi to this point has come from Obama administration sources. The accounts of these brave witnesses raise troubling questions about the veracity of what we’ve been told by official sources since the attack took place.

The first contradiction pits former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s explanation of security conditions at the compound against that of Eric Nordstrom, the former regional security officer at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli. In his testimony Wednesday, he repeated assertions he’d made to Congressional investigators last year that his recommendations to upgrade security were ignored at the highest levels.

Yet roughly four months after the attacks, Clinton told the House Committee on Foreign Affairs that “specific requests and decision making” on security “rest with the security professionals.”

Even more disturbing was the discrepancy over what happened during the attack. The official story in the Accountability Review Board (ARB) report concluded there was no “undue” denial of support or assets. Yet we heard testimony from Deputy Chief of Mission Greg Hicks that four special operations military personnel in Tripoli were preparing to go to Benghazi on a rescue mission when they were told to stand down. This is jarring, taken against then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s claim in February that “time, distance, the lack of an adequate warning. . . prevented a more immediate response.”

Opinion: Benghazi hearing’s real target: Clinton in 2016

Furthermore, the Foreign Emergency Support Team (FEST), which the State Department’s website calls “the United States Government’s only interagency, on-call, short-notice team poised to respond to terrorist incidents worldwide” was not called into action.

For nearly two weeks after the attack, the Obama administration continued to peddle the story that it began as a demonstration against a video and got out of hand — a claim that is now universally understood to be false. But at Wednesday’s hearing, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-South Carolina, quoted what he said was an internal e-mail dated the day after the attack in which Assistant Secretary of State Beth Jones told the Libyan ambassador that Islamic group Ansar al-Sharia was responsible for the attack.

The video claim was pure fiction, but Hicks testified that he was reassigned to a lower-level position after he questioned it. (A State Department spokesman maintains that Hicks was not subjected to retaliation.)

More troubling than the initial video claim, however, is the allegation of serious flaws in the report issued by the Accountability Review Board, convened by Clinton, whose members include retired diplomat Thomas R. Pickering and retired Adm. Mike Mullen, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. All three career diplomats who testified Wednesday complained about the report, which they said was incomplete and assigned blame to the wrong personnel.

As Congressional investigators have tried to get answers, the State Department has thrown up roadblocks. For example, Hicks testified that the State Department sent a lawyer from Washington in an unsuccessful attempt to ensure that I did not speak to him privately during my visit to Libya after the attacks.

These concerted efforts by the State Department to conceal information from Congress should raise red flags.

We have four dead Americans. To date, nobody has been captured or killed. The terrorists are still on the run. And we have an increasing number of contradictions between what we were led to believe and what the witnesses say actually happened. It’s hard to take any refutations of the testimony seriously given the impeccable credentials of the witnesses and the despicable record of misdirection from this administration.

Follow us on Twitter @CNNOpinion

Join us on Facebook/CNNOpinion

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of

Jason Chaffetz.

PostHeaderIcon Surveying the Surging Immensity of Life

One of the enduring mysteries of literary history is the appearance in 19th-century Russia, that vast and barbarous country, of the greatest writers of fiction in all of literature. Leo Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoyevsky are supreme among the novelists of all nations, with Ivan Turgenev not far behind. Then there is Anton Chekhov, master of the short story, and Ivan Goncharov, author of “Oblomov” and “A Common Story.” Among the Russians, the purest artist is Nikolai Gogol (1809-1852), author of the play “The Inspector General,” some unforgettable stories, and a single novel, “Dead Souls,” which, even though unfinished, is nonetheless a masterpiece.

Gogol is the comic genius among Russian writers, always playful but never shallow. He had a magnificent eye for the bizarre, for the madcap, above all for what was extraordinary in the ordinary. In his story “The Nose,” he wrote about a barber who wakes one morning to discover a nose stuffed into his morning loaf of bread. The nose turns out to belong to one of his customers, Collegiate Assessor Kovalyov. How the nose got into the barber’s bread and how one morning it reappeared on the face of its owner is never explained. Plots are not Gogol’s strong point. Nor was he much interested in ideas, at least not directly.

[image]

Getty Images

Portrait of Gogol from the 1830s by Jean Guerin.

“Dead Souls” is about Pavel Ivanovich Chichikov, who travels the provincial countryside buying up dead serfs from small landowners. These serfs remain on the landowners’ books until the next census and, even though dead, are still taxable. Chichikov offers to relieve the landowners of their tax burden. His plan is to install these dead serfs on the tax rolls of a far-away estate, on which he will then be able to get a generous government mortgage and come away with a small fortune.

The great Russian poet Alexander Pushkin was Gogol’s friend and supporter, and the man who gave him the idea for “Dead Souls.” Gogol refers to the book not as a novel but as a poem. “Dead Souls” is a poem about Russia, its provincial backwaters, its secondary characters (clerks, minor officials, small landowners), its heartbreaking squalor. “Russia! Russia!” Gogol exclaims midway through the book, “. . . Everything in you is open, desolate and level; your squat towns barely protrude in the midst of the plains like dots, like counters; there is nothing to tempt or enchant the onlooker’s gaze. But what is this inscrutable, mysterious force that draws me to you?”

What gives “Dead Souls” its poetic quality is its author’s exuberant passion for the details—one might even say the irrelevant details—of provincial Russian life. In his brief, brilliant study “Nikolai Gogol,” Vladimir Nabokov accounts for Gogol’s artistry through this and what he calls Gogol’s “four dimensional” prose, a sinuous style that captures characters in their inner being. Gogol’s scenes light up their surroundings, his characters flame into life, his tragicomic vision touches the reader’s heart.

I write “tragicomic,” for Gogol was far from the mere humorist he is sometimes advertised as being. “I am fated to journey hand in hand with my strange heroes and to survey the surging immensity of life,” he wrote in “Dead Souls,” “to survey it through the laughter that all can see and through unknown invisible tears.” The book’s characters might be thought stock—the miser, the spendthrift, the bearish Russian and the rest—but for their creator’s ability to bring them to life with a shimmering individuality.

Chichikov, the character at the heart of Gogol’s masterpiece, is a lower-echelon civil servant with a corrupt past who specializes in what Gogol calls “blandiloquence,” or elaborately empty compliments. Chichikov was brought up by a father whose last words of advice to his son were to please his superiors, not to be seduced by friendship, and to remember that nothing in life is so important as money—advice, notes Gogol, “that remained deeply engraved in his soul.”

One of life’s “acquirers”—for Gogol, a major sin—Chichikov turns out to be an inept acquirer, which makes him quite as interesting as he is detestable. “Wise is the man,” Gogol writes, “who does not disdain any character, and instead, examining him with a searching look, plumbs him to the very main-springs of his being.” That sentence should stand as the first commandment for every novelist.

Chichikov is a fantasist who imagines himself one day running a plush and productive estate, with a pretty wife and fine children, himself the very model of the perfect Russian citizen. Although Gogol writes that “we have not taken a virtuous man as our hero,” he has made Chichikov, though vile and petty in so many ways, oddly sympathetic.

When the rascal is caught out at his game, Chichikov garners our pity. Who cannot feel for the poor wretch, down on his knees, begging forgiveness “in his tailcoat of Narvarino smoke and flame, in his velvet waistcoat and new trousers, with his satin necktie and carefully groomed hair from which emanated the fresh smell of eau de Cologne”?

Gogol was contemplating two further volumes to complete “Dead Souls.” The plan was for the first volume to be devoted to crime, the second to punishment and a third to redemption. He thought of the completed “Dead Souls” as a catechism of sorts that would save the Russian soul. In his second and third volumes, he wrote to a friend, “the Russian would appear in the fullness of his national nature, in all the rich variety of the inner forces contained within him.” Gogol, thank goodness, was never able to get these volumes, with their implicit preachiness, written.

Late in his short life, Gogol found religion and promptly lost art. Once Gogol began to think of himself as a Christian reformer, Nabokov writes, “he lost the magic of creating something out of nothing.” His genius for devising delicious details disappeared; his powers of invention deserted him. Before his death, he burned what he had written of the second volume of his novel. The last 10 years of his life Gogol suffered greatly from writer’s block; he died an excruciating death from anemia of the brain at the age of 43.

“Dead Souls,” meanwhile, is among that small number of uncompleted masterpieces that includes Tchaikovsky’s Unfinished Symphony, and Robert Musil’s “The Man Without Qualities,” but with the important qualification that Nikolai Gogol’s great work is all the better for remaining unfinished.

—Mr. Epstein is the author, most recently, with Frederic Raphael, of “Distant Intimacy: A Friendship in the Age of the Internet.”

A version of this article appeared May 4, 2013, on page C13 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Surveying the Surging Immensity of Life.

© 2011 Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com)

PostHeaderIcon Second term off to rocky start

News headlines of the past week portray an administration engulfed in potential scandal, providing opponents of President Barack Obama with plenty of ammunition to try to derail his agenda in the early months of his second term.

The scenario invites comparisons to previous presidents who faced controversies in their “lame duck” second terms, such as the Iran-Contra scandal of the Reagan administration and Bill Clinton’s impeachment for perjury and obstruction of justice in the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

However, a rocky start to a second term doesn’t mean certain derailment of a president’s goals or agenda. For example, Reagan and Clinton both signed major fiscal legislation during their lame duck terms, noted Howard Kurtz, the host of CNN’s “Reliable Sources.”

Despite increasingly strident rhetoric from Republican leaders and others, White House spokesman Jay Carney insisted Tuesday the controversies have little connection to Obama’s second-term agenda.

“The president is focused on what he believes the American people expect from him and from their leaders in Washington,” he told reporters, citing campaign issues from his re-election last November such as economic growth, expanded opportunities for the middle class and immigration reform.

In question is whether Republicans intent on focusing attention on potential scandal will be willing to work with Obama and Democrats on such major legislation. Already, the president has seen stiff GOP opposition derail gun legislation he proposed in the aftermath of the Connecticut school massacre.

Full details of the controversies remain unknown, but the issues are certain to continue to dominate Washington in coming days.

Carney spoke as Attorney General Eric Holder announced a Justice Department investigation of whether any laws were broken in the IRS political targeting. Congress also is looking into the matter, with a House committee hearing scheduled for Friday.

The embattled Holder, cited for contempt of Congress by House Republicans during Obama’s first term over the botched “Fast and Furious” gun walking program, also confirmed that he recused himself last year from his department’s investigation of classified leaks that led to the recent secret subpoenas of telephone logs of The Associated Press.

According to the AP, U.S. officials have said they were probing how details were leaked in May 2012 about a foiled bomb plot that targeted a U.S.-bound aircraft, and that the Justice Department collected two months of telephone records for some AP reporters and editors without notifying the news organization.

The Republican National Committee called for Obama to demand Holder’s resignation over the matter. If not, said RNC Chairman Reince Priebus, it will show that “the president of the United States believes his administration is above the Constitution and does not respect the role of a free press.”

Even Democrats such as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada condemned the secret subpoena of AP phone records.

“I don’t know who did it, or why it was done, but it’s inexcusable, and there’s no way to justify this,” Reid told reporters.

Meanwhile, Republican senators characterized the IRS political targeting as a broad abuse of power by the administration.

“I have never seen anything quite like this except in the past during the Nixon years,” veteran Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, told reporters in an allusion to the Watergate scandal that led to President Richard Nixon’s impeachment and resignation.

Carney rejected such GOP statements as political hyperbole, but also sought to distance the administration from the roiling issues.

“I understand the natural inclination to try to bunch some of these things together, but there really is a distinction here,” he said.

He refused to discuss specific details of the Justice Department’s subpoena of AP telephone records, citing the ongoing criminal investigation of the classified leak. At the same time, he described Obama as desiring a balance between protecting classified information vital to national security and the First Amendment right of a free and unfettered press.

Carney also avoided specific comment on IRS political targeting, saying it would be inappropriate until the upcoming release of an inspector general’s report on the matter. He noted Obama’s remarks to reporters on Monday that if the reported allegations of political targeting proved true, they would be “outrageous” and require immediate action against those responsible.

However, Carney criticized the continuing GOP focus on the administration’s response in the immediate aftermath of the Benghazi attack last September 11 as a “sideshow that’s driven purely by or largely by political interests.”

The Benghazi issue has renewed GOP criticism of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, considered the certain Democratic frontrunner if she decides to run for president in 2016.

In particular, Republicans accuse the administration of not bolstering security prior to the attack, of botching the response to it, and of misleading the public in its slow-to-evolve explanation of events less than two months before the November election.

After the GOP-led House Oversight Committee held a hearing last week on the attack that killed the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other Americans, Republican politicians and organizations launched a campaign that sought to raise questions about Clinton’s role as the nation’s top diplomat at the time.

An independent review of the Benghazi incident, led by Former Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen and former ambassador Thomas Pickering, found no wrongdoing by Clinton.

CNN’s Chief National Correspondent John King noted that history shows popular politicians can overcome links to scandal.

In 1988, Democrats tried to use the Iran-Contra scandal of the Reagan administration, which involved weapons sales to Iran that funded anti-communist rebels in Nicaragua, against then-Vice President George H.W. Bush, he said.

The scandal involved an attempted cover-up, televised congressional hearings, criminal charges and resignations, but in the end, Bush won the presidential vote.

CNN’s Paul Steinhauser contributed to this report.

PostHeaderIcon Frequent-Flier Miles: The Best Airlines for Cashing In

[image]

Ryan Snook

Booking a free ticket with your frequent-flier miles can seem like casino gambling: Getting what you want is like hitting a jackpot, but more often than not, the house wins.

Not all airlines offer the same odds. Availability of award tickets at the basic mileage level on United Airlines is twice as good, for example, as on Delta Air Lines

or US Airways,

according to the Switchfly Reward Seat Availability Survey. The survey, to be released Thursday, found that United had seats available on 80% of the queries made. Delta and US Airways both had the lowest availability rate among the 25 airlines, at only 36.4%.

WSJ ‘Middle Seat’ columnist Scott McCartney outlines the best and worst airlines for travelers who want to redeem their frequent flier miles. Photo: Getty Images.

Where Miles Matter Most

Here are results of a test of seat availability for June-October.

Southwest Airlines

and JetBlue Airways

scored best among U.S. airlines. Those two, along with other discount airlines, showed greater availability than airlines with big international networks. Southwest had seats available for every query. Southwest’s AirTran Airways unit had seats available for 95% of queries, while JetBlue offered seats 88.6% of the time.

The disparity in availability is “not accidental,” said Jay Sorensen, president of IdeaWorksCompany, a consulting firm that conducted the study. Some airlines “consciously provide more award seats.”

The survey also tested booking tickets just five to 15 days before departure in April. The chances of getting tickets were better than when booking three to seven months in advance on Delta, US Airways and American Airlines. This indicates airlines have gotten more aggressive about making unsold seats available shortly before departure to make sure planes take off full. Delta’s short-term booking rate increased 35 points over the same period in 2012.

Cashing in miles has been a source of long-standing frustration. Some fliers set clocks to request free tickets at midnight 331 days, or about 11 months, before departure—traditionally the moment airlines open a flight for booking—only to find no seats available on popular flights. And airlines have raised the price of award tickets by introducing higher-cost award tiers, reducing availability at the lowest award level.


Overall, average award availability was about the same as last year, at 71.1%. Availability increased at discount airlines and declined at more traditional carriers with extensive international networks. “Ongoing consolidation and capacity cuts continue to squeeze reward seat availability,” said Daniel Farrar, chief executive of Switchfly Inc., a technology company that provides software for loyalty programs at airlines, hotels and banks, and sponsored the study.

Travelers have an easier time getting free tickets on discount carriers in part because they generally have short flights with multiple departures each day on each route. Airlines generally make more seats available on short flights. They tend to offer intercontinental trips only once or twice a day, and they have more confidence they can sell seats to cash-paying customers rather than giving them away for miles.

Some airlines, including Southwest, are also simply answering customer demand that frequent-flier miles be easier to cash in.

“This was one of the pain points that we tried to solve with the new program,” said Ryan Green, Southwest’s senior director of loyalty and partnerships.

Southwest’s old program had limits on availability. Southwest’s new program, launched in March 2011, offers an award price for any ticket available for sale. Southwest’s percentage of its passenger traffic flying on awards increased to 9% in 2012, from 8.3% a year earlier, according to the company’s annual 10-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The survey found seats for a huge majority of queries across all airlines for flights under 2,500 miles: nearly 85%. But the success rate for seats dropped to only 43% for flights longer than 2,500 miles.

Among carriers offering long-haul trips, Singapore Airlines

was the most generous for its frequent fliers, making seats available on 94% of queries. US Airways was the stingiest with its long flights, with award seats available on only 4.3% of queries.

Air France-KLM

showed the biggest improvement of any of the 25 airlines in the survey, with availability jumping 22.2 points to 77.9%. An Air France spokeswoman said that as part of an improvement program, the carrier did “indeed try to make more award seats available.”

Delta and US Airways have scored at the bottom for award seats all four years of the survey, though both have upped their availability. In 2010, both carriers offered seats to fewer than 13% of the IdeaWorks queries.

Delta says it, like other airlines, offers all seats on planes to frequent fliers, just at higher mileage cost than the lowest redemption level, which is 25,000 miles for a domestic coach round-trip ticket. Both Delta and US Airways have a three-tier redemption structure, offering seats at the basic level, a midtier level at around 40,000 miles for a domestic coach ticket and a full-fare level for as many as 60,000 miles for domestic coach round trips.

A Delta spokeswoman said the carrier was pleased the survey showed its increased availability for close-in bookings, something Delta has tried to boost. Half of all Delta award tickets are now booked within 60 days of departure. “Award demand is at an all-time high,” she said. Yet Delta customers actually redeemed fewer awards last year compared with 2011, according to the company’s SEC filings, and the percentage of passenger traffic flying on awards last year dipped as well.

US Airways, which said in its 10-K filing that its redemption totals were unchanged from 2011, notes that its short-haul route structure means its customers take longer to reach awards and many prefer to redeem awards on partner airlines for long trips. That availability doesn’t show up on the airline’s website—customers have to call—so it wouldn’t be included in the study, a US Airways spokesman noted.

Consumers earn more miles these days as rewards from credit-card companies and other vendors rather than from actual flying. American Airlines reported in its SEC filings that it issued 209 billion frequent-flier miles in 2012; 66% of them were sold by the airline to partner companies to give as rewards to their customers. The allure of free travel to prized destinations has remained a powerful driver of consumer loyalty.

The survey is based on 7,000 booking requests for two seats at the lowest mileage level, now often called “saver” awards, at 25 airlines. Each airline’s website receives 280 queries on their busiest routes. Consumers can sometimes find better award availability by calling airlines and getting an experienced agent to hunt for seats and check the inventory of airline partners. The vast majority of award tickets, however, are booked online.

IdeaWorks made queries in March for travel dates spanning June through October, and selected itineraries that always included a Saturday-night stay with travel on each airline’s top 10 routes under 2,500 miles and 10 busiest routes longer than 2,500 miles in order to evaluate availability in each carrier’s strongest markets. Circuitous routes and layovers longer than four hours were rejected.

IdeaWorks kept track of the lowest offer each airline had for seats on trips under 2,500 miles and found Southwest had the lowest average cost, at 9,353 points. US Airways had the highest, with an average of 31,143 miles required to get a round-trip ticket for flights under 2,500 miles.

Write to Scott McCartney at middleseat@wsj.com

A version of this article appeared May 9, 2013, on page D1 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Best Airlines for Cashing In Miles.

© 2011 Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com)